Jones v. Tsige, 2012 ONCA 32

From Ad IDEM / CMLA

Jump to: navigation, search

**Watch this page for further comments. AdIDEM members please feel free to contribute by editing this page or commenting on the "discussion" link above**

Privacy v. Freedom of the press

[73] Finally, claims for the protection of privacy may give rise to competing claims. Foremost are claims for the protection of freedom of expression and freedom of the press. As we are not confronted with such a competing claim here, I need not consider the issue in detail. Suffice it to say, no right to privacy can be absolute and many claims for the protection of privacy will have to be reconciled with, and even yield to, such competing claims. A useful analogy may be found in the Supreme Court of Canada’s elaboration of the common law of defamation in Grant v. Torstar where the court held, at para. 65, that “[w]hen proper weight is given to the constitutional value of free expression on matters of public interest, the balance tips in favour of broadening the defences available to those who communicate facts it is in the public’s interest to know.”

Links

Full decision: Jones v. Tsige, 2012 ONCA 32 (Canlii)

Personal tools