R. v. Murrin

From Ad IDEM / CMLA

Revision as of 11:48, 1 May 2009 by Dan Burnett (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

The court rejected a motion for a publication ban on information that Crown claimed would prejudice a subsequent trial. The court held that multiple trials are nothing new, that the justice system can handle such situations fairly, and that the ultimate test is whether 12 reasonable jurors can be found.

R. v. Murrin

Personal tools